Turns out, not much at all. Both use transmitters and receivers. Both use the public switched telephone network (PTSN). Both carry digital signals. (Note that although this article uses the widely accepted term “Wi-Fi,” it would be more accurate to describe it as Wireless Local Access Network or WLAN. Wi-Fi technically is a trademark of the Wi-Fi Alliance and can legally be used for only those products that comply with Alliance functionality standards and certification testing.)
Some less savvy wireless users tend to think that voice and data differ between Cellular and Wi-Fi. This thinking is an analog hangover from the not-so-distant past when plain old telephone service (POTS) was essentially the only option available to most people for communicating with their neighbors and family down the street or across the country. Today of course voice and data are digitized into data streams, equally accessible on both SmartPhones and laptops/tablets/PCs.
In fact, the latest generation of SmartPhones have what is known as Fixed-Mobile Convergence (FMC), offering both Cellular and Wi-Fi capabilities. It provides seamless service (i.e., no perceptible interruption in voice/data transmission of a call in process) between Cellular and Wi-Fi. So the demarcations between voice and data as well as Cellular and Wi-Fi have been erased completely. Note that FMC covers much more than Wi-Fi to Cellular and vice versa. For example, it applies to hardwire connections like cable, T-Carriers and DSL. Now, thanks to FMC, your cell phone can serve as an extension phone from the PBX of your business. But we digress…
There are differences, certainly. Among them:
- Wi-Fi has a very limited range of between 100 and 200 feet, depending upon obstructions. Cellular can extend its signal for potentially hundreds of miles.
- An access point or “hot spot,” typically mounted in the ceiling of an open room or other elevated point, serves as Wi-Fi’s transmitter and receiver. Cellular’s transmitter and receiver is the call site or base station, commonly called a cell tower, where antennas and electronic communications equipment are mounted at the top of a radio mast.
- Wi-Fi and Cellular operate on different frequencies of the radio spectrum. Depending upon company and technology, Cellular broadcasts on frequencies ranging from either 800-900 MHz or 1900-2100 MHz; Wi-Fi airs on 2400 MHz (2.4GHz) or 5000 MHz (5 GHz). As a rule, lower frequencies cover larger areas in comparison to higher frequencies. Another rule — higher frequencies provide faster data transmission to more customers in smaller areas as opposed to lower frequencies.
Global Cellular Device Users — Cellular and Wi-Fi Share of Total Monthly Data Use January 2014 and December 2014
Data Source: archive.org
“The truth is spectrum, kiddo. It ain’t black or white. It’s more than grey.” — Toba Beta
Cellular uses a part of the radio frequency spectrum designated by a government’s regulatory frequency assignment authority. In the U.S., the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) administers government use of the airwaves; the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does the same for commercial use. These frequencies are awarded through lotteries or auction and may be sold or conveyed by the original designee to a successor.
However, Wi-Fi operates in the so-called “unlicensed spectrum.” This portion of the spectrum is primarily 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz and is used for Wi-Fi networking because, as IEEE Spectrum’s Terry Ngo says, “these are the only available parts of the radio spectrum that have the range and bandwidth needed.”
What Wi-Fi and Cellular really have in common is a virtual traffic jam. Consider these numbers:
Over 80% of American homes and 50% of those worldwide are in urban areas overrun by people using Wi-Fi. These are the same areas where Cellular users experience the most dropped calls and the slowest connections. Add transmissions from Bluetooth-compatible devices – which operate between the frequencies 2.4 MHz and 3.5 MHz, the same as the lower Wi-Fi spectrum frequency – and it’s little wonder why so many connections suffer.
The prognosis is even grimmer. According to the information technology research company Gartner, “6.4 billion connected things will be in use worldwide in 2016, up 30 percent from 2015, and will reach 20.8 billion” – an incredible 2.8 connected devices for every person on earth – “by 2020. In 2016, 5.5 million new things will get connected every day.” As the Internet of Things (IoT) becomes more entrenched in everyday life, look for this saturation of the airwaves to intensify.
The lust for speed by mobile device users is causing gridlock throughout the airwaves. Increased speed means wider bandwidth which means fewer paths available for use within the frequency spectrum. As people have migrated to WLANs from cable-connected Ethernet LANs, more and more wireless routers have appeared, not only in homes but in public hot spots as well.
The spectrum shortage affects Cellular too. With each evolution of technical standards – from 2G to 3G to 4G – cellular territorial coverage has plummeted. The progression from 2G to 3G , for example, shrank tower coverage by 20%. 4G takes an even bigger cut. And with the proliferation of SmartPhones and their bandwidth-hogging apps, carriers are migrating traffic when possible into the already-crowded Wi-Fi spectrum.
Thus cellular airwaves are just as crowded as those at the higher end of the spectrum. The switch from hardwire to wireless can be likened to commuters changing from public transportation to driving their individual cars, causing traffic jams in their neighborhoods but traveling unimpeded once they enter a freeway. Similarly, once calls/data get past the choke point of the radio spectrum and into the copper/fiber environment of the PSTN, there’s plenty of routes and capacity available.
“Americans Will Put Up with Anything Provided It Doesn’t Block Traffic” — Dan Rather
So what solutions are available to network engineers and planners to alleviate the congestion of the radio spectrum used for Wi-Fi and Cellular communications
1. Build more infrastructure. Seems obvious but now that that SmartPhone markets are maturing (i.e., pretty much everyone who wants a SmartPhone already has one), carriers are loathe to sink more capital investment into adding to or replacing existing network hardware. One strategy to reclaim cellular coverage and increase capacity at a relatively low cost is the deployment of Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS), e.g., microcells, picocells and femtocells. One microcell can easily cover a small college or high school campus. One may consider picocells and femtocells as Cellular’s version of the Wi-Fi hot spot; they’re ideal for placement inside buildings and address the issue of signal loss through buildings. On the whole, a microcell’s range is less than 1¼ miles (2 km) wide, a picocell 650 feet (200 meters) wide and a femtocell 33 feet (10 meters) wide. One other point: in most cases, the costs of installing and maintaining DAS micro-sites will be borne by the venue or host, not the carrier. See the chart below on Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Comparison:
Image Source: Cisco
Courtesy of Cisco Systems, Inc. Unauthorized use not permitted. Accessed 10 December 2016
2. Expand Wi-Fi coverage into existing cellular base stations. Again, a fairly obvious solution. Base stations can easily hold hundreds of Wi-Fi transceivers within a cell tower footprint along with Cellular transmitters and receivers.
3. Increase the number of Wi-Fi hot spots. Estimates are that by the end of 2014 there were almost 48 million hot spots — a Wi-Fi access point for every 150 people — across the globe. As the Internet of Things (IoT) becomes further entrenched in everyday life and machine-to-machine (M2M) communications proliferate, the number of Wi-Fi access points will have to increase exponentially. And so it will: iPass predicts that by 2018 there will be one public hot spot per every 20 people worldwide.
One other development only beginning to appear on the radar screen, so to speak, is the coming availability of 150 MHz of the 3.5 GHz band. Suitable for wireless broadband, a 100 MHz portion of this portion of the spectrum was previously reserved for military radar use. On 15 April 2015 the FCC approved use of this “Innovation Band” for commercial wireless networks. However, it will be years down the road before the rollout of this portion of the spectrum occurs.